Avalos

Avalos v. Cedana

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:22-cv-00861California3,799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VANESSA AVALOS, Individually and as No. 2:22-cv-00861-TLN-KJN Successor in Interest TO THE ESTATE OF ERNESTO ISAIAH AVALOS,

DECEASED,

ORDER Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants County of San Joaquin (the “County”); Patrick Withrow (“Withrow”); Mary Cedana, R.N. (“Cedana”); Sarai Hardwick, L.V.N. (“Hardwick”); Mandeep Kaur, R.N. (“Kaur”); Robyn Mendoza (“Mendoza”); Andrea Lopez (“Lopez”); and Sgt. Izaguirre’s (“Izaguirre”) (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff Vanessa Avalos (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 10.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. /// /// 27 Defendant Johnnie Morris has not been served with notice of Plaintiff’s lawsuit and does not join in the instant motion. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On July 25, 2021, Ernesto Isaiah…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.