Ayeni-Aarons
Ayeni-Aarons v. Best Buy Credit Services/CBNA
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSBERT AYENI-AARONS, No. 2:18-cv-01625-MCE-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER BEST BUY CREDIT CARD SERVICES CBNA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Osbert Ayeni-Aarons’ (“Plaintiff”) Motion to File a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”). ECF No. 45. Defendant Trans Union, LLC, filed a statement of non-opposition, ECF No. 47, whereas Defendant Best Buy Co. (“Best Buy”) filed an opposition to the Motion. ECF No. 48. For the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED.2 Generally, a motion to amend is subject to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a),3 which provides that “[t]he court should freely give leave [to amend] when justice so
1 Defendant Experian did not file an opposition or any response to the present Motion. Former Defendant Citibank, N.A., filed an opposition, ECF No. 50, but it has since been dismissed from the case. See ECF No. 85.
2 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance,…