Mueller

(PC) Driver v. Mueller

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:23-cv-01233California1,483 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 2:23-cv-1233 DAD KJN P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is before the court. It is recommended that the motion be denied. Background On July 28, 2023, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff be required to pay the court’s filing fee in full to proceed with this action because plaintiff has accrued three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff’s Complaint Plaintiff claims that defendants Mueller and Drozd, both U.S. District Court Judges, deprived plaintiff of his access to the court based on their rulings in prior cases. Also, on June 27 Plaintiff does not provide a case number for the case he claims Judge Mueller issued an order on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.