(PC) Johnson v. Woodland Public Defenders Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:22-cv-01325California413 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KEVIN B. JOHNSON, No. 2:22-cv-01325-DJC-DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER WOODLAND PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE – YOLO COUNTY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 5, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The Court has reviewed the file, and finds that the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that the action should be dismissed to be correct. However, the Court notes that only two of the three state court criminal cases in which Plaintiff alleges he 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.