Moghaddam

(PC) Gaddy v. Moghaddam

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:16-cv-02269California3,602 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL GADDY, No. 2:16-cv-2269 TLN AC P plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

E. MOGHADDAM, et al. defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this court are plaintiff’s requests for ruling (ECF Nos. 83-85, 88, 90-93) and defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 75 et seq.). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s requests for ruling will be denied as moot. It will also be recommended that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted and that this action be dismissed. I. REQUESTS FOR RULING Plaintiff has filed several motions requesting that the court issue a ruling on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. See ECF Nos. 83, 84, 85, 88, 90-93. Because the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.