Hildebrand

(PC) Martin v. Hildebrand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20231:22-cv-00953California1,282 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED ANDREW MARTIN, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00953 JLT SKO (PC) Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

HILDEBRAND, et al., PROSECUTE AND TO OBEY COURT

ORDERS

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

Plaintiff Jared Andrew Martin is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his original complaint on August 2, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On May 12, 2023, this Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 7.) The Court found Plaintiff stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim against Defendant Hildebrand but he failed to state any other cognizable claim against any other defendant. (Id. at 4-13.) Plaintiff was directed to elect one of the following options within 21 days of the date of service of the order: (1) notify the Court that he did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.