Jimenez

Jimenez v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20232:23-cv-00937California2,828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 No. 2:23-cv-00937 WBS AC MIGUEL JIMENEZ and JUDE DELATTA, 13 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 15 HOME DEPOT INC., and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. 18 ----oo0oo---- Miguel Jimenez and Jude Delatta (“plaintiffs”) brought this action against Home Depot Inc. (“defendant”), alleging violations of state law in connection to their experiences while shopping at one of defendant’s stores. They assert claims for false imprisonment (Claim 1); false light (Claim 2); intentional infliction of emotional distress (“IIED”) (Claim 3); violation of the Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code § 51 (Claim 4); violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq. (Claims 5 and 7); and negligence (Claim 6). (See generally Compl. (Docket No. 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.