(PC) Plett v. Religious Committee

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIKEL PLETT, Case No. 2:23-cv-00683-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER RELIGIOUS COMMITTEE, Defendant. 16 On May 23, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that his complaint did not contain cognizable claims. ECF No. 8. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or an advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation of dismissal. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s May 23 order. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). Involuntary…