Warden

(HC) Lizarraga v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20231:23-cv-00888California1,372 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 ALBERTO LIZARRAGA, ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-00888-JLT-SKO (HC) ) Petitioner, ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO ) DISMISS SECOND AMENDED PETITION v. ) ) [TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE] 14 ) WARDEN LUNDY, ) ) Respondent. ) ) 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed a federal habeas petition in this Court on May 30, 2023. (Doc. 1.) The Court conducted a preliminary screening of the petition and determined that Petitioner failed to name a proper respondent, failed to present any cognizable grounds for relief, and failed to exhaust state remedies. (Doc. 6.) Petitioner was granted leave to file a First Amended Petition to cure these deficiencies. On June 29, 2023, Petitioner filed a First Amended Petition. (Doc. 9.) Review of the petition revealed that Petitioner again failed to present cognizable grounds for relief. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.