Covello

(PC) Windham v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20232:22-cv-01931California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES WINDHAM, Case No. 2:22-cv-01931-TLN-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS PATRICK COVELLO, et al.¸ Defendants. 16 On December 21, 2022 I screened plaintiff’s complaint and notified him that his claims were not cognizable. ECF No. 12. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, on June 16, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 18. I warned him that failure to comply with that order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded. Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that: 1. This action be dismissed without prejudice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.