Warden

(HC) Martinez v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20232:23-cv-00615California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL PAHUA MARTINEZ, No. 2:23-cv-00615-EFB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in this petition for writ of habeas corpus brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On July 13, 2023, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. ECF No. 10. Petitioner has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition and the time for doing so has expired. A responding party’s failure “to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(l). Failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 110. The court may dismiss this action with or without prejudice,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.