Vasquez

(PC) Lindsey v. Vasquez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20231:23-cv-00991California906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGJUAN DONNELL LINDSEY, Case No. 1:23-cv-00991-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

VASQUEZ, et al., REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

Defendants. ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 Plaintiff RegJuan Donnell Lindsey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 30, 2023, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to show cause, within twenty-one days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff did not file a response, and the deadline to do so has expired. I. Legal Standard The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity and/or against an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.