(PS) Davis v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Co. of Sacramento, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20232:23-cv-00657California399 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARON DREVON DAVIS, No. 2:23–cv–00657-TLN–CKD PS Plaintiff, ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR COMPANY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c). On June 30, 2023, the undersigned issued an order screening the complaint and finding that it did not establish a basis for federal jurisdiction nor state a claim under the federal pleading standards. Plaintiff was granted 28 days to either amend the complaint or file a notice of voluntary dismissal, and was informed that failure to do either would result dismissal of the action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pleading, discovery, and motion practice in this action are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.