Alvarez

Alvarez v. Harder Mechanical Contractors

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20231:23-cv-01162California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

1:23-cv-01162-BAM

SERGIO ALVAREZ,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE COMPLETED APPLICATION TO v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS OR PAY FILING FEE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

HARDER MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS,

16 Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Sergio Alvarez, proceeding pro se, filed this civil action on August 4, 2023, 18 along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (Docs. 1, 2.) However, as there 19 are deficiencies with the IFP application, the Court will direct Plaintiff to file a new application. 20 First, Plaintiff listed “$2300.00” in response to item 2a requiring he “state the amount of 21 your take-home salary or wages and pay period and give the name and address of your 22 employer.” (Doc. 2 at 1.) Plaintiff’s response of “$2300.00” does not include the pay period for 23 this amount, nor does it include the name and address of the employer. Second, in response to 24 item 6 requiring Plaintiff “List the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.