Riebe

(PC) Casity v. Riebe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20232:22-cv-02181California414 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD D. CASITY, Case No. 2:22-cv-02181-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER; FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

TODD RIEBE, et al.¸ Defendants. 16 On May 4, 2023, I screened plaintiff’s amended complaint and notified him that his claims were not cognizable. ECF No. 14. I granted him thirty days to file an amended complaint or advisement indicating his intent to stand by his current complaint, subject to a recommendation that it be dismissed. Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, on July 5, 2023, I ordered him to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed. ECF No. 15. I warned him that failure to comply with that order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. The deadline has passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall randomly assign a District Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.