(HC)Harris

(HC)Harris v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20231:22-cv-00601California466 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL J. HARRIS, No. 1:22-cv-00601-ADA-CDB

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS DISMISSING THE

v. PETITION WITH PREJUDICE AND

DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

SEAN MOORE, CLOSE THE CASE

Respondent. (ECF No. 20)

Petitioner Daniel J. Harris (“Petitioner”) proceeds pro se and in forma pauperis in this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF Nos. 1, 3.) This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 25, 2023, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations to dismiss Petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus as untimely. (ECF No. 20.) The Court served the findings and recommendations on Petitioner and gave him fourteen days to file objections thereto. (Id. at 4-5.) On May 4, 2023, Petitioner filed objections. (ECF No. 21.) In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.