Sartin

Sartin v. Humphreys University

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20232:23-cv-00658California2,181 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONIA SARTIN, No. 2:23-cv-00658-DCJ-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER

HUMPHREYS UNIVERSITY and

BEACON ORAL SPECIALISTS

MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendants. 17 Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) on the basis that Plaintiff has failed to establish standing for injunctive relief. Because the Court agrees that Plaintiff has not alleged a plausible and sincere intent to return to Defendant Beacon Oral Specialists Management LLC’s oral surgery center, Plaintiff does not have an “actual and imminent” injury required for Article III standing. Accordingly, the Court will submit the matter without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), and GRANT Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend. I. Background Plaintiff Tonia Sartin, a disabled individual and wheelchair user, brings the present suit alleging that she faced barriers to accessing the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.