DEA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY S. VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-1116 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, et al., 15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. During the pendency of plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, and before the court denied the motion on July 21, 2023, and granted plaintiff sixty days in which to file an amended complaint, plaintiff filed two additional motions for extension of time to amend. (ECF Nos. 22 & 25.) Despite the July 21, 2023 order, plaintiff filed a third motion, this time seeking to stay the action for ninety days based on plaintiff’s alleged failure to obtain “adequate legal envelopes.” (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff claims he has only received two envelopes. Plaintiff fails to explain why he needs more than two envelopes to comply with this court’s June 30, 2023 order to file an amended complaint. No defendant has yet been served, and plaintiff is not required…