(PS) Crocker v. County of Amador

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20232:22-cv-01924California4,632 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN CROCKER, No. 2:22-cv-1924 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF AMADOR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se and in forma pauperis, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). ECF Nos. 3, 4. Before the court is defendants’ motion to dismiss. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has opposed the motion at ECF No. 16. Defendants submitted a reply brief (ECF No. 17) and plaintiff submitted an unauthorized surreply at ECF No. 18. The parties appeared before the court to argue the motion on May 5, 2023. ECF No. 23. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends the motion to dismiss be GRANTED and that the complaint be DISMISSED with leave to amend as to some claims and not others. I. Background A. The Complaint Plaintiff Benjamin Crocker brings this case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.