(PC) Robles v. Johnson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 9, 20231:22-cv-00620California1,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTONIO G. ROBLES, Case No. 1:22-cv-00620-ADA-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION NUNC PRO TUNC FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND

STEVEN JOHNSON, et al., ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Defendants. (Doc. 10)

ORDER VACATING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

(Doc. 9)

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

SHOW CAUSE

19 (Doc. 8)

AUGUST 31, 2023, DEADLINE

22 Plaintiff Antonio G. Robles is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT On April 26, 2023, the Court entered a screening order finding the complaint failed to state a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim and did not allege exhaustion of Plaintiff’s state twenty-one days and warned that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.