Martinez
Martinez v. P.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANTONIO MARTINEZ, JR., ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-01134 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ) CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR v. ) FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO BRUCE P., et al., ) COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER ) Defendants. ) ) )
On April 26, 2023, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to quash Plaintiff’s proof of service and directed Plaintiff to re-serve his first amended complaint on Defendants or file and serve a second amended complaint within 65 days. (See Doc. 21 at 6-7.) The Court cautioned Plaintiff that failure to do so could result in the issuance of an order to show cause. (Id. at 7.) To date, Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order and the time to do so has passed. The Local Rules, corresponding with Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, provide: “Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all…