Cox

(PC) Bailey v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20231:22-cv-00757California378 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY BAILEY, No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR COPY

v. (ECF No. 42) T. COX, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for a copy of Defendants’ motion to dismiss, filed August 9, 2023. Plaintiff contends that he has not yet received a copy of Defendants’ motion due to his transition at his current facility. (ECF No. 42.) Plaintiff is advised that the Court does not ordinarily provide free copies of case documents to parties. The Clerk of Court charges $.50 per page for copies of documents. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). Copies of up to twenty pages may be made by the Clerk Office at this Court upon written request and prepayment of the copy fees. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.