(PC) Spearman v. Public Defenders Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 REGINALD EDWARD SPEARMAN, No. 2:21-cv-1290 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
PUBLIC DEFENDER’S OFFICE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 26, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit for a non-prisoner, and he was given thirty days to do so. ECF No. 9. More than thirty days have passed, and plaintiff has not filed the form, nor has he responded to the court’s order in any way. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is directed to assign a District Judge to this case. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted…