Gobert

(PC) Bradford v. Gobert

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20232:21-cv-02373California2,124 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:21-cv-2373 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JONATHAN GOBERT, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 2. The complaint also includes requests for a temporary restraining order, for a preliminary injunction, and for an “ad litem guardianship appointment of counsel.” Id. at 7-8. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. For the reasons stated below, the undersigned will recommend that plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and that plaintiff be ordered to pay the filing fee in full prior to proceeding any further with this action. In addition, it will be recommended that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.