Curry

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DARYLE L. HUMPHRIES, Case No. 2:22-cv-00090 KJN PC 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO MODIFY v. THE DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER P. CURRY, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On August 9, 2023, defendant filed a motion to modify the scheduling order. As set forth below, defendant’s motion is granted. “The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Rule 16(b) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4). “The schedule may be modified ‘if it cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension.’” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co.,…