Lozano

Lozano v. Butte County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20232:22-cv-01313California4,134 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL LOZANO, No. 2:22-cv-01313-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER BUTTE COUNTY et al., Defendant. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Butte County (the “County”), Butte County Board of Supervisors, Butte County Department of Developmental Services, Paula Daneluk, Bill Connelly, Steve Lambert, and Doug Teeter’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff Rafael Lozano (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition and Defendant filed a reply. (ECF Nos. 13, 14.). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Butte County Code regulates the cultivation of marijuana in Butte County. See Butte County Code (“BCC”) Chapter 34-A and Chapter 34-C. Pursuant to the BCC, if the County becomes aware of a violation of this ordinance, a Code Enforcement Officer posts a 72-hour 5…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.