(PC) Poe v. Attorney General's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20232:23-cv-00859California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER M. POE, No. 2:23-cv-00859-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, et. al., 15 Defendants.

17 By order dated May 16, 2023, plaintiff was directed to either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the required fees totaling $402.00. ECF No. 4. He was further cautioned that failing to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.