(PC)Somerville

(PC)Somerville v. Bettancourt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20231:21-cv-01695California355 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD MICHAEL SOMERVILLE, Case No. 1:21-cv-01695-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS DEFENDANT

v.

(Doc. 1) B. BETANCOURT, et al., Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Clerk of the Court to Assign District Judge 18 Plaintiff Richard Michael Somerville is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court screened the complaint and found that it states a cognizable Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Defendants Betancourt, Marquez, and Rios, Correctional Officers (“COs”) employed at Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (“SATF”)–Corcoran. (Doc. 12.) However, the Court found that the allegations did not state a claim against the Warden of SATF. (Id.) In response to the screening order, Plaintiff elected to proceed on complaint as screened and agrees with dismissal of the Warden because he has no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.