Dillard

Washington v. Dillard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20231:23-cv-00431California381 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERRY KENJI WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00431-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Docs. 1, 9) CURTIS DILLARD, et al.,

Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Perry Kenji Washington (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this civil rights action against Defendants Curtis Dillard and Ebony on March 22, 2023. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Eastern District of California Local Rule 302. On July 14, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to appoint counsel and a motion for a temporary restraining order. (Docs. 5, 6.) On July 18, 2023, the magistrate judge denied the motion to appoint counsel and issued findings and recommendations to deny the motion for temporary restraining order. (Doc. 9.) Plaintiff was granted twenty-one days in which to file objections to the findings and recommendations. The deadline to file…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.