Bonta

(HC) Calderon v. Bonta

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20232:23-cv-01389California894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-1389 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ROB BONTA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, and a motion for injunctive relief. Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit. Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The court is required to screen all actions brought by prisoners who seek any form of relief, including habeas relief, from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a habeas petition or portion thereof if the prisoner raises claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious” or fail to state a basis on which habeas relief may be granted.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.