(HC) Calderon v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20232:23-cv-00956California1,207 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-00956-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a county inmate proceeding pro se in this federal habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, the court must review all petitions for writ of habeas corpus and summarily dismiss any petition if it is plain that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. The court has conducted that review. For the reasons that follow, the undersigned recommends summarily dismissing the federal habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction. I. Petitioner’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Application Before the court could screen petitioner’s habeas corpus application docketed on May 22, 2023, petitioner filed a first amended § 2254 application. Because the amended petition supersedes the original § 2254 application, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.