Pacheco

(PC) Price v. Pacheco

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20232:22-cv-01610California4,755 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JoANN PRICE, et al., No. 2:22-CV-1610-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ARTURO PACHECO, et al., Defendants.

AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS.

18 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs are the estate and successor-in-interest of Ronnie Price, who is deceased. Pending before the Court is Defendant Lynch’s motion to dismiss. See ECF No. 38. Defendant has filed a request for judicial notice in support of his motion. See ECF Nos. 38-1 and 38-2. Plaintiffs have filed an opposition. See ECF No. 40. Defendant has filed a reply. See ECF No. 44. Following a hearing before the undersigned on June 2, 2023, the matter was submitted. / / / / / / / / / In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all allegations of material fact in the complaint as true. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.