Sacramento Homeless Union v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO HOMELESS UNION, et No. 2:22-cv-01095-TLN-KJN al., 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Sacramento Homeless Union, Betty Rios, Donta Williams, and Falisha Scott’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO”). (ECF No. 36.) The City and County of Sacramento filed oppositions. (ECF Nos. 38, 41, 45.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 46.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court MODIFIES and EXTENDS the existing injunction. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND A full recitation of the factual background of this case is set forth fully in the Court’s prior order. (ECF No. 22.) In short, the instant case arises from Defendants’ alleged failure to discharge their duties during Sacramento’s triple-digit heat wave to protect the unhoused, one of society’s most vulnerable populations. …