Schaber

(HC) Sinclair v. Schaber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20232:23-cv-01166California1,382 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ALEXANDER SINCLAIR, No. 2: 23-cv-1166 TLN KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

GORDON D. SHABER, et al., Respondents. 15 Petitioner, prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, together with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. On July 18, 2023, the undersigned recommended dismissal of this action based on petitioner’s failure to inform the court of his address change, as required by Local Rule 183(b). (ECF No. 4.) On August 10, 2023, petitioner filed a notice of change of address and motion for change of venue. (ECF No. 5.) Accordingly, the July 18, 2023 findings and recommendations are vacated because petitioner informed the court of his current address. The undersigned herein addresses petitioner’s in forma pauperis application, the petition and petitioner’s motion for change of venue. (ECF Nos. 1, 2, 5.) For the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.