Contreas

(PC) Haynes v. Contreas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20231:22-cv-00536California1,061 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYSHAWN HAYNES, Case No. 1:22-cv-00536-JLT-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO

EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS

13 v.

F. CONTREAS, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 Rayshawn Haynes (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Cleveland, Luna, Cloud, Orozco, Chan, and Contreras1 and his Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Rodriguez for unwanted medical treatment.2 (ECF Nos. 1, 8, 12, & 18).

1 Plaintiff’s complaint identifies this defendant as “F. Contreas.” (ECF No. 1). Defendants’ answer indicates the correct spelling is “F. Contreras.” (ECF No. 21). Accordingly, the Court will utilize the correct spelling. 2 Defendants’ statement indicates that they construe Plaintiff’s complaint as “assert[ing] that Defendants retaliated against him” and that Defendants “anticipate asserting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.