Fong
Fong v. U.S. Bancorp
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETER FONG, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01291-MCE-KJN Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER U.S. BANCORP, et al., Defendants. 16 By way of this action, Plaintiffs Peter Fong and Sut Fong (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), 17 on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, seek to recover for injuries 18 sustained when valuables they stored in a safe deposit box with Defendants U.S. 19 Bancorp (“USB”) and U.S. Bank National Association (“USBNA”) (collectively, 20 “Defendants”)1 were discovered missing. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ 21 Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss, or Alternatively, Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 22 10). For the following reasons, that Motion is GRANTED.2
26 1 USBNA is a wholly owned subsidiary of USB.
2 Because oral argument would not have been of material assistance, the Court declined to set a hearing date and decides this matter on the briefs. E.D. Local Rule 230(g). 28 BACKGROUND3 2 …