Wolff

(PC) Lispier v. Wolff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20231:23-cv-00729California1,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES LISPIER, Case No. 1:23-cv-00729-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

v. ACTION WOLFF, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

Defendants. FOR FAILURE TO OBEY COURT ORDER

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

16 (ECF No. 10)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 I. Background Plaintiff James Lispier (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 30, 2023, the Court screened the complaint and directed Plaintiff to either file a first amended complaint or notify the Court of his willingness to proceed on the cognizable claims identified by the Court. (ECF No. 10.) The Court expressly warned Plaintiff that his 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.