Paca

Washington v. Paca

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20231:23-cv-00673California3,871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERRY KENJI WASHINGTON, Case No. 1:23-cv-00673-JLT-SKO Plaintiff, FIRST SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO: MARY L. PACA, et al., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR Defendants. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND ON HIS

COMPLAINT

17 (Doc. 1)

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (Doc. 5) 22 23 Plaintiff Perry Kenji Washington, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on May 2, 2023. (Doc. 1.) Upon reviewing the complaint, the Court concludes that the complaint fails to state any cognizable claims. Plaintiff has the following options as to how to proceed. He may file an amended complaint, which the Court will screen in due course. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court stating that he wants to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.