(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Bros

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20232:23-cv-00975California1,626 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUISEN, No. 2:23-cv-00975-DJC-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER WARNER BROS., et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint, plaintiff has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, a motion for appointment of counsel, and several motions seeking various forms of amendments and supplements to his complaint. Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). Screening Standards Notwithstanding payment of the filing fee, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.