(SS) Hindsman v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20232:22-cv-00772California5,524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMBERLY ANN HINDSMAN, No. 2:22-cv-00772-EFB (SS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. ECF No. 1. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are pending. ECF Nos. 16 & 181. For the reasons provided below, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and the Commissioner’s motion for summary judgment is granted. I. Background In September 2014, plaintiff filed applications for disability insurance benefits (DIB) and supplemental security income (SSI) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (Act), 26 27 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all proceedings in this action,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.