Blizzard

(PC) Singh v. Blizzard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20232:23-cv-00024California1,263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Raghvendra Singh, No. 2:23-cv-00024-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Thadd A. Blizzard, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Raghvendra Singh is proceeding in this action without an attorney. The matter 18 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). In response 19 to Singh’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the Magistrate Judge screened the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and issued findings and recommendations that the complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. See generally F&Rs, ECF No. 3. Plaintiff objected to the 22 findings and recommendations. See generally Objs., ECF No. 4. According to Singh’s complaint, the defendants are state court judges who presided over 24 cases in which he was named as a defendant. See Compl. at 1-2, ECF No. 1. He alleges he never 25 received copies of the complaints in these cases and could not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.