Cox

(PC) Carter v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20232:20-cv-01322California664 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLYDE DAVID CARTER, No. 2:20-cv-01322-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER B. COX, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On June 6, 2023, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. No objections have been filed. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. The court presumes that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.