Castillo

(PC) Bratton v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20232:21-cv-00076California507 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TORY BRATTON, No. 2:21-cv-00076-KJM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CASTILLO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge as provided by Eastern District of California local rules. On June 13, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and contained notice that the parties may file objections within the time specified therein. Plaintiff filed a notice in response. Notice, ECF No. 35. In the notice, plaintiff states plaintiff will follow the magistrate judge’s recommendations and dismiss the claims against defendant Bobbala. Id. at 2. The court construes plaintiff’s filing as a non-opposition to the findings and recommendations. This court reviews the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations, but plaintiff need…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.