Ison

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JAMES J. ISON AND THE ISON No. 2:21-cv-01546-JAM-KJN

LAW FIRM, PC,

13 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DIAMOND v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 38)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ETHAN P. SCHULMAN, et al., 17 Defendants. 18 The matter is before the Court on Stuart D. Diamond and Stuart D. Diamond Law & Mediation Office’s (“Diamond Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). FAC, ECF No. 12.; Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 38. Plaintiffs oppose the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 46. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No. 48. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss.1

1This motion was deemed suitable for submission without hearing under E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for July 11, 2023. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this…