Quick

(PC) Torres v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20231:22-cv-01536California640 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

v. OPPOSITION DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

TO DISMISS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS JAYSON QUICK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Edward Torres (“Plaintiff’) is incarcerated at Ironwood State Prison and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On July 12, 2023, Defendants Quick and Martinez filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23).1 On July 21, 2023, Defendant Garza joined the pending motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 26). On 20 August 17, 2023, Defendant Garcia also joined the pending motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 31). 21 Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within 22 twenty-one days (Local Rule 230(l)), but did not do so. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure 23 “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.