Quick
(PC) Torres v. Quick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 EDWARD TORRES, Case No. 1:22-cv-01536-ADA-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE
OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-
v. OPPOSITION DEFENDANTS’ MOTION
TO DISMISS WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS JAYSON QUICK, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Edward Torres (“Plaintiff’) is incarcerated at Ironwood State Prison and is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action. On July 12, 2023, Defendants Quick and Martinez filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23).1 On July 21, 2023, Defendant Garza joined the pending motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 26). On 20 August 17, 2023, Defendant Garcia also joined the pending motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 31). 21 Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within 22 twenty-one days (Local Rule 230(l)), but did not do so. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure 23 “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any…