Kraft

Kraft v. Tulare County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20231:21-cv-00768California1,615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUNE KRAFT, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-00768 JLT SKO ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S RENEWED ) MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT v. ) PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL ) PROCEDURE 59(e) TULARE COUNTY, et al., ) Defendants. ) (Doc. 68) ) 16 The Court entered judgment in this matter on March 27, 2023, following the Court’s dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for lack of standing. (Docs. 62, 63.) On April 6, 2023, Plaintiff moved to modify the judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), which the Court denied. (Docs. 64, 67.) On April 18, 2023, Plaintiff filed a document titled “Plaintiff’s Objections” under Rule 46, which the Court construes as a renewed motion for reconsideration.1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.2 ///

1 Because Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 46 governs objections at trial and does not provide for objections to a district judge’s order prior to trial, courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.