Muniz

(PC) Cisneros v. Muniz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20231:22-cv-01601California2,391 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CISNEROS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01601-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER FINDING FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT VIOLATIVE OF

v. RULE 8 AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, STAND

JUAN MUNIZ, RAVIJOT GILL, ON COMPLAINT, OR FILE VOLUNTARY

MARIANA LOTERSZTAIN, MARIE DISMISSAL1

RUSSELL, and CDCR, (Doc. No. 6) Defendants.

SEPTEMBER 22, 2023 DEADLINE

17 Pending before the Court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is the first amended pro se civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by Daniel Cisneros—a prisoner. (Doc. No. 6, “FAC”). Upon review, the Court finds the FAC violates the procedural rules governing pleadings. The Court affords Plaintiff the option to file an amended complaint or voluntarily dismiss his Complaint before recommending the district court dismiss this action. SCREENING REQUIREMENT A plaintiff who commences an action while in prison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.