Workforce Defense League v. Clayco, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 WORKFORCE DEFENSE LEAGUE, No. 2:22-cv-00502-JAM-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO STAY
CLAYCO, INC.; and UNITED
CONTRACTOR SERVICES, LLC,
12 Defendants. 13 Clayco, Inc. and United Contractor Services, LLC (“Defendants”) petition the Court to stay Workforce Defense League’s (“Plaintiff”) claim pending the completion of the California Labor Commissioner’s Bureau of Field Enforcement (“BOFE”) investigation of Defendants’ alleged conduct underlying the instant case. See Mot. to Stay (“Mot.”), ECF No. 41. Defendants contend that a stay would preserve judicial resources and avoid inconsistent findings between the Court and BOFE. Id. at 5. Plaintiff opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 43. Defendants replied. See Reply, ECF No. 44. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion.1
1This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing…