Arisco
(PC) Loftis v. Arisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUISE DEANGELO LOFTIS, No. 1:22-cv-01266-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN PART FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
v. (Doc. 19) ARISCO, et al., Defendants. 16 Marquise DeAngelo Loftis is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The assigned magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found it stated the following cognizable claims: (1) excessive force/failure to protect against Defendants Rosales, Tienda, and Diaz in violation of the Eighth Amendment (claim 2); (2) excessive force against Defendants Tienda and Diaz in violation of the Eighth Amendment (claim 5); (3) failure to intervene against Defendant Navarro in violation of the Eighth Amendment (claim 5); and (4) retaliation against Defendant Navarro in violation of the First Amendment (claim 6). (Doc. 19.) The magistrate judge further recommended that all other claims be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state…