Pinnacle Employee Services, Inc. v. Pinnacle Holding Co., LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20232:22-cv-01367California1,681 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 1] Pinnacle Employee Services, Inc., et al., No. 2:22-cv-01367-KJM-CKD Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Pinnacle Holding Company, LLC, Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiffs Pinnacle Employee Services, Inc. (PES) and Michael Allen bring this trademark infringement action against defendant Pinnacle Holding Company, LLC (PHC). See generally Compl., ECF No. 1. PHC previously moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, Mot. Dismiss, ECF No. 18; plaintiffs opposed and requested jurisdictional discovery, Opp’n, ECF No. 19. This court granted plaintiffs’ request, setting a deadline for a motion to amend the complaint after discovery. Prior Order, ECF No. 24. Plaintiffs now timely move to amend their complaint. Mot., ECF No. 25. Defendant opposes, and the motion is fully briefed. Opp’n, ECF No. 27; Reply, ECF No. 28. The court submitted the motion without hearing oral arguments. Min.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.